|
|
|
|
THE GREAT OIL DEBATE: AMSOIL by Ed Newman AMSOIL Marketing and Advertising Coordinator Appeared in the February 2001 Issue of American Iron Magazine AMSOIL: Manufacturer of the first API rated synthetic motor oil offers experience and insights INTRODUCTORY
THOUGHTS The
cover of the most recent Forbes ASAP exclaims in large red
letters, "What Is True?" The magazine chooses a theme
for each issue and in an age of information, misinformation and
disinformation, it comes as no small surprise that people are
confused about almost everything. Contradictions and competing
viewpoints abound. No question about it, it's not easy being a
consumer sometimes. Nowhere
is this more of a problem than in the area of motorcycle
lubrication. On the
one hand bikers are told by equipment manufacturers that
automobile oils are not capable of protecting their bikes.
On the other hand, a synthetic motor oil company like
AMSOIL has been providing motorcycles with superb performance
and protection for nearly three decades. What's a motorcyclist
to believe? This spring Donny Petersen defended, even recommended, the use of synthetic motor oils. In November Harley-Davidson responded, taking Donny to task and challenging many of his assertions. A rebuttal by Chuck Goldmann (ExxonMobil) provided readers with an excellent overview of synthetic motor oils and their advantages over petroleum. I'd
like to commend American Iron for creating this opportunity for
the exchange of ideas regarding the care and feeding of our
machines, and to Donny's courage in putting his convictions down
in black and white as a starting point.
It's always easier to say nothing than to go on record
and This
article is a response to all three of the abovementioned
articles. AMSOIL synthetic motor oils were the first API rated
synthetic motor oils in the world when introduced in 1972.
With nearly three decades of experience, and
documentation, AMSOIL can make a contribution to this My
premise is this: Everyone knows synthetic oil is better than
refined petroleum. Why
not use it? SYNTHETICS OFFER SUPERIOR PERFORMANCE AND PROTECTION The advantages of synthetic motor oils are well known and have been written about for decades. I have SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.) papers in my files that repeatedly endorsed the various benefits of synthetics. Whether extended service life, improved fuel economy, increased power, reduced friction and wear, resistance to breakdown, better low and high temperature protection, you name it, the documentation is out there. The studies have been done. All
of this leads one to ask a couple fundamental questions. Is the
Harley V-Twin engine different from all other engines in the
world? Is there
something so unique with a Harley engine that all of the
lubrication rules that apply to all other four stroke engines
must be thrown out the window? Yes,
theirs is air-cooled and can run hot.
For this reason alone one would think it even more
important to have a premium synthetic motor oil. One of Donny's comments that bears repeating came near the conclusion of his April column. "The Motor Company didn't reinvent the air-cooled engine and, therefore, its engines don't require specially formulated, Harley-only fluids." This summary remark stands at the crux of the debate. DUAL QUALIFIED OILS There
were two topics which the previous writers waded into with great
detail which I would like to re-visit briefly here:
dual qualified motor oils and additive chemistry. Historically,
one of the biggest problems AMSOIL has faced when selling motor
oils to the motorcycle market has to do with this notion that
automobile oils can't be used in motorcycles.
Chuck Goldmann did an excellent job of explaining how
some motor oils might not be suited for There
are actually two issues here.
The first is that the motor oil be capable of meeting
both passenger car and diesel performance requirements.
The second issue has to do with the use of friction
modifiers. The
truth is that friction modifiers have never been a real
performance issue. OEMs
(bike manufacturers), however, created such a strong public
perception against them that in 1998 AMSOIL re-formulated its
two leading oils for the motorcycle market.
Later, because of the continued misinformation that an
automobile oil cannot be used as a motorcycle oil, AMSOIL took
the last step of producing two grades of AMSOIL synthetic
motorcycle oil. Public
perceptions and fears can drive consumer behavior, whether true
or not. Last year's
Millennial Day Meltdown fear resulted in tremendous sales of
generators and packaged dried foods.
The fear driving this debate revolves around the question
of whether it is acceptable or safe to use anything but Factory
oil. CHEMISTRY CLASS All of the articles presented chemistry lessons. I'm not sure how important many of these details are for riders, but it is fascinating for those of us who are so inclined. Do we really need a chemistry degree in order to choose a motor oil? No. But it's good to remember that all motor oils are not created equal. It
is unlikely that any major motor oil company today is going to
produce a really bad product. But is "adequate" what riders
really want? If you
are going to change it frequently, if you are going to be a
kind, tame rider who never gets on the throttle, well,
Harley-Davidson Oil is just fine, as most motorcycle oils
probably are. But
if you're the kind of rider who puts your machine through its
paces, who makes modifications that bump your horsepower to the
next level, if you're cranking it up and you want to know your
engine has the protection it needs, or simply want the best, a
premium synthetic motorcycle oil is the lubricant of choice. Here's
how I see it. Additive chemistries are just that: additives.
They are chemicals that have been added to the base
stock. These
chemicals have various functions.
But the final product can only be as good as the
foundation you build on. Quite
honestly, there would be no synthetic motor oil market if the
only thing you needed to do to get premium performance from
crude oil was put some chemicals in it.
The fact is, petroleum has its limitations. All oils are not created equal. A
premium product does not end with the base stock.
Additive selection makes a difference.
Chuck Goldmann notes that not only is selection
important, the process of assembling the motor oil is also
important. In
short, you want an experienced manufacturer who understands the
interrelationship of the various components of the lubricants
being produced. It
is not simply a matter of putting ingredients together. Harley-Davidson
noted, correctly, that "you cannot distinguish between a
good motor oil and a better motor oil by additive metals
analysis alone." Remember,
though, that this is not the same as saying additive metals
don't make a difference. The
truth is a manufacturer can skimp on certain chemicals to keep
costs down and consumers will not notice anything, even though
there are consequences. I
would like to use an example from a different industry that
readers may understand. In the realm of house paint, not all paints are created equal. If you take a really cheap white paint, you may need three coats of paint to cover a medium colored surface. If you take a very high end professional paint, you can cover that surface with one coat. I once painted a black door white with a single coat of premium high quality paint. All of these paints look white inside the pail. But the high quality paint has a higher additive content. By increasing the amount of titanium white, an additive, you can get better coverage. This additive is expensive, however, and people often do not wish to pay the price, so paint manufacturers produce low end products to satisfy the consumer who wants to buy on price. Savvy consumers who value their time are willing to pay more to get the better, one-coat coverage. When
it comes to additives, AMSOIL spends more so that the oil
exceeds, not simply meets, the demands of a long life lubricant.
High TBN, and sufficient zinc and phosphorous, helps
reduce engine corrosion and wear, increases oil service life and
reduces maintenance costs. REAL BENEFITS FOR RIDERS What does all this mean for readers? There are two very real and noticeable benefits for bikers who use a premium synthetic motorcycle oil like AMSOIL. First, the engine runs cooler. Reduced friction results in cooler operating temps. If you are riding hard out on the desert or stuck in city traffic in L.A., you can definitely feel the heat from your hog. What can you do? You can't install air conditioning. You can use a premium synthetic and run perceptibly cooler. The
second benefit, extended drain intervals and longer service
life, is appreciated by many AMSOIL users.
Instead of having to change the oil midway through the
season, you simply change the filter. The oil's additive package is beefy enough so that the oil is
good to go for up to three times the equipment manufacturer's
recommendation or one year, whichever comes first.
If you are uncomfortable with extended drains you can
still change at normal intervals and needn't have fear if
inconveniences cause you to go beyond your normal oil change
interval. Another,
less noticeable but very real benefit of a beefy additive
package in a synthetic is this: at the end of the year, bikers
in northern tier states also appreciate knowing that the
anticorrosive characteristics of a premium synthetic are better
than their petrol counterparts.
There is less likelihood of rust and pitting on parts
inside the engine as it sits idle through the winter. WARRANTY ISSUES A major concern many riders have had pertains to the warranty issue. Harley Davidson has created the impression that if you are a rider who uses any oil besides Harley-Davidson oil, you will void your warranty. Many motorcycle shops believe this to be the case, although the writer of the November Harley-Davidson article indicates that "in a pinch Harley-Davidson recommends that a rider use one of the API C category oils as a substitute for Harley-Davidson 360." Nevertheless, the impression is out there that the warranty will be voided if you use another product, and since the bike has cost a good chunk of change, no one really wants to gamble with that much money on the table. Fortunately, there is a law called the Magnusson-Moss Act that says, in layman's terms, an OEM cannot require a consumer to use an OEM part or fluid in order to maintain warranty coverage unless that part or fluid is provided free of charge. I
can't speak for other oil companies, but I can say that AMSOIL
warrants its oil against lubrication related failure.
We have 28 years experience and wouldn't be in business
today if engine failures were a problem. We have more experience with synthetics and extended drain
intervals than anyone in the industry. MARKETING Don, in his April column, wrote: "There is nothing wrong with Harley oil, and it is a good fossil oil to run in your bike. It is just that modern marketing can be very skillful in making the consumer paranoid about using anything but the manufacturer's suggested oil. There are better oils out there. Period." Right on, Donny. I can't agree more. It
would appear that Harley-Davidson has not made it a goal to
empower riders to make choices. They have made a marketing
decision, forced reliance on Harley-Davidson.
Is this what riders want?
Do riders really want to be stuck with no options
regarding motor oil selection? Do riders want to be forced to
use inferior oil when they know other products can provide
better protection, reduce heat, increase horsepower? They say it is not a marketing issue, however, Harley-Davidson has chosen not to help their customers use other products. There are no factual reasons for this. Their oil does not offer the benefits of a synthetic, and it is clearly a marketing move. A lot of riders change ignitions and make other modifications to run their Harleys at higher RPM, modifying their bikes to get more horsepower. This puts more stress on the engine, creates more heat. These modifications may also present warranty problems as well. Perhaps even a majority of riders modify their bikes to increase performance, and most really ought to be using a higher performance motor oil. It would appear that Harley-Davidson is not interested in helping these riders. With
more heat generated, oil breakdown does occur. The graph on
oxidation performance in the December issue shows a shocking
difference between HD 360 and Mobil 1 V Twin oil.
This chart and many other tests for benchmarking
performance prove emphatically the superior capabilities of
synthetic motor oils. Why,
then, has Harley-Davidson refused to promote the performance
benefits synthetics offer?
It might be that being affiliated with one oil supplier
for so long has slowed Harley-Davidson's adoption of
advancements in lubrication technology. IN SUMMARY Synthetic motor oils offer numerous performance advantages over conventional petroleum based products. For this reason, in nearly every other market - from trucks to cars to heavy duty equipment to sport vehicles - synthetics have been greeted with increasing enthusiasm. The technology is proven. The benefits are many. There seems to be no good reason why motorcycle owners should be discouraged from embracing this trend.
Appeared in the February 2001 Issue of American Iron Magazine |
|||
|
|
| © Copyright 1996 - 2006 AMSOIL INC. All Rights Reserved. |